|
2 Years Off
From: "Lynn" <lynnerzs@y...> Date: Fri Nov 29, 2002 7:24 pm Subject: 2 yrs off Ativan&Librium/ Msg. to Gloria and all re AMBIEN... Dear Group, It's been a couple of years since I have posted. I check-in to read the posts from time to time and will always be grateful to this site while I was doing a 10 month taper off of Ativan & Librium. The knowledge and reassurance from the Old Timers and the support of others who were going through the withdrawals and understood, helped me beyond words... 2 yrs/2mos later, I'm feeling pretty good these days. I remember asking over and over again - will I ever be normal again...will it get easier!? The fear of being not being able to function and wondering if I could cope with life again was overwhelming at times. Seeing posts from others who got through it and were *back at life* again was a great support. I'm grateful to say that the only symptom I'm challenged with at this point is some insomnia. I'm not even sure that the insomnia is due to the previous benzo usage at this point as I'm 46 and it may very well be perimenopausal issues. Gloria had posted earlier today about using Ambien for sleep assistance. I wanted to share my experience with Ambien as this medicine acts very much like a Benzo in our systems. I knew that Ambien was similar to benzos and (STUPIDLY) used it to help me sleep about a year after I had finished my taper. I developed toleranceto it within 3 mos. and suffered benzo-like withdrawals after discontinuance. I had to use Librium for several weeks to stop help the withdrawal symptoms from the Ambien. Please be very, very careful using this medicine. It's dangerous stuff, too! Here is a brief synopsis on how Ambien is similar to benzos. This information was written by a chemist. Love and blessings to all, Lynn in Arizona - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Is Ambien a Benzodiazapine? April 8, 2002, at 9:22:22 Is Ambien a Benzodiazapine? The whole argument turns on semantics and your definition of what is or is not a benzodiazepine. If you define a benzo by it's chemical structure, a benzene ring attached to a seven-sided diazepine nucleus, well then, no, Ambien is not a benzo. But that strikes me as a rather transparent linguistic maneuver. Think about this example. You tell a child not to walk over a line. He subsequently jumps over the line, and then insists that he didn't break your rule because he did not in fact walk over the line, he jumped over it. In a literal sense he is correct. But we feel that he is attempting to deceive us, and we can see right through it. He has ended up on the other side of the line, regardless of how he got there. I think the analogy is fairly clear with Ambien and the benzodiazepines. No, Ambien does not literally have a benzene ring and a diazepine nucleus. But it does act at the GABA BZD1 receptor complex just like a classical benzodiazepine. It gets to the same place, so to speak, albeit with a different chemical structure. So, from the standpoint of a chemist Ambien is not a benzodiazepine, but from the standpoint of a patient's nervous system it is a benzodiazepine. It is particularly annoying to me that the marketing folks at Searle have leveraged this little word game to make Ambien seem more innocuous to prescribing physicians and sleep disturbed consumers. |